Senator Mike Folmer

Home
Contact Me
Senate Republican News
Electronic Bill Room
Visit the Capitol

 
Home

About Senator Folmer
>Profile
>News
>Columns
>Comcast Newsmakers
>Mike's Memo
>Audio/Video
>Television Show
>Photos
>District Info
Services
>Constituent Services
>Contact Me
>Staff Listings
>Sign Up for "Mike's Memo"

Resources/Links
>Electronic Bill Room
>Visit the Capitol
>Senate
>State
>Local
>Federal
>Senior
>Veterans
>Kids


Live Senate Feed

 

Citizen Access Page

 

Do Not Call

June 11, 2008
Back to Columns

Why I Opposed the Smoking Ban
By Senator Mike Folmer

Following is my response to Richard Thierolf regarding my vote against the statewide ban on smoking in private establishments.

First let me say that Mr. Thierolf's assertion that I've been "bought off" by the tobacco industry is ludicrous. He is free to examine my campaign finance reports, readily available by contacting the PA Department of State or my campaign. In so doing, he'll discover that less than three-tenths of one percent of all the money I've ever received in campaign donations has come from tobacco interests.

I agree that smoking is undisputedly a serious health hazard. I celebrate the fact that as a society we have made significant progress to curtail smoking. A few decades ago, smoking was omnipresent; today, through the commendable efforts of public health advocates and groups such as the American Lung Association and the American Cancer Society, smoking is disallowed in hospitals, airplanes and airports, libraries, theaters, malls, publicly owned buildings, and many sports venues and restaurants.

I wholeheartedly believe that we should continue to push for good public health. At the same time, I am obliged to uphold the solemn oath I made to honor the Constitution, which protects private property rights. Pennsylvanians are endowed by God with the right to own and use private property. Smoking, though highly unhealthful and distasteful, is legal. Further, it is the right and the prerogative of those who own private establishments to determine whether or not their patrons can engage in legal activities. Non-smokers enter a private establishment as a privilege extended by the owner, not as a constitutional right. The private business owner's right to allow his patrons to engage in a legal activity supersedes the intolerance of that activity by those who patronize the establishment by privilege.   

We should – and we will – continue to wage the battle against smoking, but we should not do so by burning the Constitution into a pile of ashes. 

 

 

Privacy Policy
2007 © Senate of Pennsylvania